Brain MRI is now produced at a scale no radiologist can read by hand, and deep learning promised to help — but the early methods had four problems I set out to fix. They often lost to older, simpler machine-learning methods; they didn't hold up on scans from hospitals they hadn't seen; they were black boxes a doctor couldn't interrogate; and each one only knew a single disease. My PhD, at the LaBRI in Bordeaux, was about building a generation of methods that are accurate, that generalize, that a clinician can understand, and that handle many diseases at once.
The common thread is to not predict a label out of thin air, but to build interpretable biomarkers on top of a full map of the brain. Every scan is first segmented into around 132 anatomical structures by AssemblyNet — a 'collective AI' of many 3D U-Nets that vote together — and the diagnosis is then read off those structures, so every answer can be traced back to where in the brain it came from.
The work moved in four steps. First, a biomarker called deep grading for accurate Alzheimer's diagnosis and prognosis. Second, a multi-channel version that tells apart cognitively normal people, Alzheimer's and frontotemporal dementia — a genuine differential diagnosis. Third, a new biomarker, brain structure ages, that scales to many pathologies at once and stays interpretable, demonstrated across Alzheimer's, FTD, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's and schizophrenia. Fourth, a head-to-head study of CNNs versus transformers for multi-disease diagnosis, compared on generalization and on how understandable each model is.
All of it was integrated into volBrain — a free online brain-volumetry platform used by researchers worldwide — as four registered (legally protected) software tools, so the methods are something people actually run on their own data rather than a result that stops at the paper.